Sunday, January 4, 2015

Art as Play and Personality



Art is both creation and recreation.  I am for amateurs in all fields.  I like amateur philosophers, amateur poets, amateur photographers, amateur magicians, amateur architects who build their own houses, amateur musicians and amateur botanists and amateur aviators.  It is spontaneous and in spontaneity alone lies the true spirit of art.

Beauty is something that cannot be accounted for by the struggle for existence and there are forms of beauty that are destructive even to the animals, like the over developed horns of a deer. Darwin saw that he could never account for the beauties of plant and animal life by natural selection, and he had to introduce the great secondary principle of sexual selection.

You cannot produce art by the force of the bay not any more than you can buy real love from a prostitute.  To understand essence of art at all, we have to go back to the physical basis of arts as an overflow of energy.  This is known as an artistic or creature impulse.  The use of the very word “inspiration” shows that the artist himself hardly knows where the impulse comes from.  It is merely a matter of inner urge, like the scientist’s impulse for the discovery of truth, or the explorer’s impulse for discovering a new island.  There is no accounting for it.  We are beginning to see today, with the help of biological knowledge, that the whole organization of our mental life is regulated by the increase or decrease and distribution of hormones in the blood acting on the various organs.  Even anger or fear is merely a matter of the supply of adrenalin. Genius itself, it seems to me, is but an overly supply of glandular secretions.

Adultery is a matter of worms growing our intestine and impelling the man to satisfy his desire.  Ambitions and aggressiveness and love of fame or power are also due to certain other worms giving the person no rest until he has achieved the object of his ambition.  The writing of a book, say a novel, is again due to species of worms which impel and urge the author to create for no reason whatsoever? Between hormones and worms, I prefer to believe in the latter.  The term is more vivid.

Every human activity has a form and expression, and all forms of expression lie within the definition of art.  It is therefore impossible to relegate the art of expression to the few fields of music and dancing and painting.  With this broader interpretation of art, therefore, good form in conduct and good personality in art are closely related and are equally important.

Given that oversupply of energy, there is an ease and gracefulness and attendance to form in whatever we do.  Now ease and gracefulness comes from a feeling of physical competence, a feeling of ability to do a thing more than well to do it beautifully.  The impulse to do a nice job or a neat job is essentially an aesthetic impulse.  Even a neat murder, a neat conspiracy neatly carried out is beautiful to look at, however condemnable that act may be.

Englishman’s monocle was part of style conversation, as a cane is a part of the style of walking. Art has a relationship to morals only in so far as the peculiar quality of a work of art is an expression of the artist’s personality.  An artist with a great personality produces grand art, an artist with a trivial personality produces trivial art, and an artist of delicacy produces delicate art. These we have relationship of art and morality in a nutshell.  Morality, therefore, is not a thing that can be superimposed from the outside.  It must grow from the inside as the natural expressions of the artist’s soul.  The mean hearted artist cannot produce a great painting and a big hearted artist cannot produce a mean picture, even if his life were at stake.  An artist’s work is strictly determined by his personality.

All good forms has a swing, and it is the swing that is beautiful to look at, whether it is the swing of a champion golf players club, or of a man of rocketing to success, or of a football player carrying the ball down the field.  There must be flow of expression, and that power of expression must not be hampered by the technique, but must be able to move freely and happily in it.  There is that swing so beautifully to look in a train going around a curve, or a yatch going at full speed with straight sails.  There is that swing in the flight of a swallow, or of a hawk dashing down on its prey, or of a champion horse racing to the finish “in good form” as we say.

Without that character or personality, a work of art is dead and no amount of virtuosity or mere perfection of technique can save it from lifelessness or lack of vitality.  Without that highly individual thing called personality, beauty itself becomes banal. All art is once and based on the same principle of expression or personality, whether it is acting in a movie picture or painting or literacy authorship.  To cultivate the charm of hat personality is the important basis for all art, for no matter what an artist does, his character shows in his work.  The cultivation of personality is both moral and aesthetic and it requires both scholarship and refinement.

No comments:

Post a Comment